<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brett Roberts &#8211; iStart leading the way to smarter technology investment.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://istart.co.nz/istart-author/brett-roberts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://istart.co.nz</link>
	<description>iStart technology in business leading the way to smarter technology investment - A/NZ ERP, CRM, BI, HR, eCommerce software research, trends and buyer&#039;s guides.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>
	Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:07:53 +0000	</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-nz</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Who cares about ERP?</title>
		<link>https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/who-cares-about-erp/</link>
				<comments>https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/who-cares-about-erp/#respond</comments>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennene Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://istart.com.au/?post_type=opinion-article&#038;p=12712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>Brett Roberts ponders the state of the monolithic ERP model and offers some disruptive ideas of his own...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/who-cares-about-erp/">Who cares about ERP?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz">iStart leading the way to smarter technology investment.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="vc_section_wrapper"><div class="wpb_row row-fluid">
	<div class="span12 wpb_column column_container">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Cards on the table, I have never had a particularly in-depth interest in the whole ‘ERP’ thing. For starters, the acronym sounds funny when you say it as a word and the name of one of the largest players in the space is an American colloquialism for a fool. Take that, couple it with the fact that sales cycles in that domain are measured in human lifetimes (“I haven’t got long to live son, can you please pick up the XYZ Corporation ERP deal I’ve been working on for the past 20 years?”) and mix in my relatively short attention span and I guess it’s not surprising that I have avoided, deliberately or otherwise, anything too ERP-related for much of my IT career.</p>
<p>Having said all that, it should not be assumed that the above means I don’t have an opinion or two on the topic. Perish the thought. And the opinion that is top of mind is that if ever there was a single IT sector that’s ripe for some seriously disruptive competition, it has to be that one.</p>
<p>However, paradoxically, it seems to me that ERP is one area where there is a relative lack of innovative and hungry start-up companies and the reasons for that are worth digging into.</p>
<p>For starters, the aforementioned long sales cycles are a problem. Start-ups need customers and cashflow fast (unless they have very patient investors with very deep pockets) and there are many other areas which would provide a much better ‘return on effort’ to earlystage entrepreneurs.</p>
<p>Secondly, there probably aren’t a lot of new, ‘green field’ opportunities around these days, which means that the opportunity to tap into and ‘own’ a particular industry or sector isn’t there. That means that the majority of business opportunities will involve displacing an incumbent and, as we all know, replacing an existing ERP solution is only slightly less complex than performing a human spine transplant.</p>
<p>Lastly, I’m not sure that the start-up ecosystem contains a lot of people with in-depth ERP expertise or experience. Only a small percentage of the tech entrepreneurs I have met have worked for large companies, let alone have deep expertise in leading or managing them. That story is slightly different in a place like the USA, but the bottom line is still pretty much the same: one of the quickest paths to failure for a start-up is a lack of domain expertise so ERP is one of those areas that the vast majority of start-up founders tend to avoid in favour of far easier pickings (not to mention a lot more fun and ‘coolness factor’).</p>
<p>One of the wonderful things about change and competition though, is that they are inevitable. So how will they arrive in the ERP domain? In bite-sized chunks I suspect. Acquisition aside, the chances of another, large ERP vendor emerging are pretty slim, but what will happen (and is happening) is the emergence of small, niche players targeting specific shortfall areas of existing ERP systems or doing something in a new, innovative or better way and I can’t see any reason that won’t happen the same way it did with CRM i.e. managers bypassing the IT department and signing up for a cloud-based service that solves a specific problem quickly, effectively and cheaply. The dominance of cloud-based CRM and the emergence of HR and staff performance tools is a good example of this, and I am sure there are others.</p>
<p>The ‘loosely-coupled, tightly-aligned’ promise of cloud-based services is an ideal tool to chip away at the old-school, monolithic ERP systems model. And that, when combined with the huge opportunity cloud-based vendors have to reset price expectations (big, monolithic vendors really hate that) convinces me that the ERP vendor landscape isn’t going to change in a big way anytime soon but it will suffer a classic and accelerating ‘pecking to death by ducks’ over the next few years, at which stage I may possibly find whole thing a lot more interesting. Or possibly not.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4328" src="https://istart.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/brett-roberts.gif" alt="writer_brett_roberts" width="150" height="129" /><span style="color: #ff9900;"><strong>ABOUT BRETT ROBERTS//</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #727272;">Brett Roberts is currently director of new technologies at Pitney Bowes New Zealand.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #727272;">He is also the co-founder of business strategy consultancy Business IQ. He says he has been in the tech world for a million years so he’s got plenty of opinions to share.</span></p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
		</div> 
	</div> 
</div></section>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/who-cares-about-erp/">Who cares about ERP?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz">iStart leading the way to smarter technology investment.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/who-cares-about-erp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dwight was right &#8211; planning is useless, but indispensible</title>
		<link>https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/dwight-was-right-planning-is-useless-but-indispensible/</link>
				<comments>https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/dwight-was-right-planning-is-useless-but-indispensible/#respond</comments>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennene Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/dwight-was-right-planning-is-useless-but-indispensible-2/</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>For successful companies, says Brett Roberts, it’s all about preparing for the battle. But while you can’t succeed without adequate preparation, planning can quickly veer into ‘useless’ territory, especially when those ‘best laid plans’ equate to little more than opportunities lost...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/dwight-was-right-planning-is-useless-but-indispensible/">Dwight was right &#8211; planning is useless, but indispensible</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz">iStart leading the way to smarter technology investment.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently stumbled across a wonderful quote from Dwight D. Eisenhower which says “in preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable”. In that one, simple Twitter-sized sentence he encapsulates several wonderful business life lessons which are worth teasing out further.</p>
<p>Firstly, for successful companies businesses is all about ‘preparing’ and ‘battle’. The level of ‘battle’ will vary substantially but the requirement for and impact of preparation is a constant. Pretty much all of the successful entrepreneurs and business owners I know have somehow found a way to take time out of working ‘in’ their business to work ‘on’ their business. In other words, they have understood the importance of ensuring their business is always prepared – be it for competition, innovation or general change – and my perception is that their businesses have become more resilient as a direct result.</p>
<p>Secondly, planning is pretty much useless for a variety of reasons. For starters, outputs from planning tend to be obsolete upon arrival i.e. by the time a highly-detailed business/marketing (or any other) plan is distributed, enough of the underlying assumptions and market conditions have changed to make the end-goal highly questionable, simply on the basis of margin of error. The other reason planning can veer into ‘useless’ territory is that it often consumes an inordinate quantity of people resource and that can result in substantial opportunity cost (yet it’s one few, if any, companies track and manage).</p>
<p>Lastly, and most importantly, Dwight was right: planning, or the process thereof, is indispensable. Planning requires research, focus, insight, communication and action and ALL of those are things which can and should happen on an on-going basis. To use management-speak, they should be part of the ‘rhythm of business’ and I would argue that those businesses which do this stuff have a much higher chance of long-term success than those that don’t.</p>
<p>So next time you’re stuck in one of those interminable management planning meetings check out mentally for a moment and have a think about what Dwight, the guy who helped mastermind the Allied invasion of Europe, would do in your situation. Chances are he wouldn’t want pages and pages of plans. What he would want are people who understand and can articulate the overall situation at any point in time and make smart decisions based on individual and team insight. In other words, what he would want is leadership. And the wonderful thing about leadership is that those who are successful at it get to write history and that’s a lot more fun than writing a plan.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/dwight-was-right-planning-is-useless-but-indispensible/">Dwight was right &#8211; planning is useless, but indispensible</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.co.nz">iStart leading the way to smarter technology investment.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://istart.co.nz/nz-opinion-article/dwight-was-right-planning-is-useless-but-indispensible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
							</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
